Jessica Pegula vs Emma Navarro Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Oct at 08:18 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Pegula vs E. Navarro

USA
3
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Pegula 3 - 0 Navarro
They have played 8 sets in total, with Jessica Pegula winning 6 and Emma Navarro winning 2. The last match between Jessica Pegula and Emma Navarro was at the China Open - Beijing, 03-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Jessica Pegula getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pegula | 3 |
| Navarro | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(QF) China Open - Beijing(10-03-25)
(QF) Bad Homburg Open - Bad Homburg(06-26-25)
(R4) Miami Open - Miami(03-25-24)
J. Pegula vs E. Navarro H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $15,131,082 | Career Prize Money | $4,603,588 |
| 64.53% (484-266) | Career Total W/L | 63.10% (236-138) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 10 | Titles | 9 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 70.83% (51-21) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.14% (32-25) |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 1 |
J. Pegula vs E. Navarro Match Preview:
- Emma Navarro has won 39.87% of points on her second serve in the past six months, compared to Jessica Pegula who has won 44.47%. Could this give Pegula an edge?
- Interestingly, Navarro outperforms Pegula on second serve returns, winning 50.52% of points, while Pegula wins 49.68%.
- First serve return stats favor Navarro as well, with 31.99% compared to Pegula’s 28.63%.
- Under pressure, Pegula has saved 53.72% of breakpoints, slightly better than Navarro’s 49.84%.
- In terms of overall match wins over the last year, Pegula leads with 68.12% compared to Navarro’s 56.90%.
- On their best surfaces, Navarro has a 71% win rate on Indoor Hard courts, while Pegula fares best on Hard courts with the same 71% win rate.
- Pegula has mostly competed in Masters series events, holding a win rate of 62.07%, while Navarro has focused on the Main tour with a 56.52% win rate.
- Direct head-to-head matches show Pegula has been dominant, winning both encounters and 4 out of 5 sets played.
- The opponents' quality analysis shows Pegula has faced tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 51.06 versus Navarro’s 64.97.
- In deciding sets, Pegula has a slight advantage, winning 55% compared to Navarro's 52% over the last 12 months.
Editorial Prediction (October 2, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performances, Jessica Pegula has shown stronger overall statistics in critical areas like second serve performance and break point saves. Her slightly better performance under pressure could be crucial.
Although Emma Navarro presents a challenge with her superior return game, Pegula's experience and success against tougher opponents may give her an edge.
Head-to-head records highlight Pegula’s historical dominance in their past encounters, suggesting she has the psychological and tactical advantage.
Considering these factors, Jessica Pegula is most likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Jessica Pegula vs Emma Navarro Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Pegula vs E. Navarro H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 44 | Games Won | 32 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:52:35 | Average Match Time | 1:52:35 |
| 68% (175/258) | 1st Serve % | 69% (169/245) |
| 68% (119/175) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (99/169) |
| 51% (42/83) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (40/76) |
| 39% (12/31) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (7/28) |
| 43% (106/245) | Return Points Win % | 38% (97/258) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Pegula Recent Matches Played
E. Navarro Recent Matches Played

J. Pegula vs E. Navarro Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.53% (484/266) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.10% (236/138) |
| 61.68% (1067/663) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.09% (515/342) |
| 54.57% (8751/7286) | Games Win/Loss | 54.63% (4262/3540) |
| 67.61% (286/137) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.89% (88/64) |
| 61.84% (128/79) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.10% (117/60) |
| 57.81% (37/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.43% (10/4) |
| 58.93% (33/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 67.74% (21/10) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1428 | Aces Total | 512 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1585 | Total Double Faults | 1024 |
| 1:12:42 | Average Match Time | 1:29:45 |
| 387.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 290.13 |
| 59% (24375/41218) | 1st Serve % | 62% (14856/23970) |
| 65% (15836/24375) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (9313/14856) |
| 49% (8191/16842) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4336/9113) |
| 47% (2453/5220) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1490/3100) |
| 46% (18835/41169) | Return Points Win % | 47% (11220/23916) |
| 65.49% (74/39) | Slam W/L | 64.86% (24/13) |
| 66.27% (110/56) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (26/26) |
| 66.67% (6/3) | Cups W/L | 75.00% (3/1) |
| 65.57% (120/63) | Main Tour W/L | 58.33% (49/35) |
| 61.92% (161/99) | Challenger W/L | 68.28% (127/59) |
| 68.42% (13/6) | Futures W/L | 63.64% (7/4) |
| 64% (476/741) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (230/368) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 58% (105/182) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (35/69) |
| 55% (131/238) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (63/110) |
| 87% (478/414) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (212/196) |
| 13% (478/64) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (212/16) |
| 25% (271/69) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (162/39) |